|
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest NewsKids Highly Likely to Transmit Coronavirus to Others: StudyKids' ER Visits for Injuries Rose During Lockdown, While Non-Injury Cases FellShould Your Child Get a COVID Test?Climate Change Is Spurring Malnutrition in Kids WorldwideNew Year, New Tips for Keeping Your Kids Safe and HealthyAHA News: Pandemic Pods Offer Social Relief, But There Are RisksPediatricians' Group Says School Is Priority, With Proper Safety MeasuresKids With Congenital Heart Disease Face Higher Odds of Mental Health IssuesReady to Resume Sports? Health Tips for Getting Back in the GameMasks Don't Mask Others' Emotions for KidsCould Going Vegetarian Lower Kids' Asthma Risk?Parents Feel the Strain as Pandemic Adds New Role: TeacherInvolved Dads Make a Difference for Disadvantaged TeensPoll Charts U.S. Parents' Biggest Worries During PandemicDo Genes Doom Some Kids to Obesity? Probably Not, Study FindsSchools, Day Care Not a Big Factor in Kids Getting COVID: StudyType 2 Diabetes in Youth Is Especially Unhealthy: StudyWhen Sepsis Strikes Children, Black Kids More Likely to Die: StudyNew Clues to Crohn's Disease in KidsKids With Dyslexia May Have Hidden StrengthsKids' Weight Rises When Convenience Stores Open Nearby: StudyA Better, Safer Way to Rid Some Kids of Seizures?More Clues to Why Kids Have Much Milder COVID-19Pandemic Causing Dangerous Delays in Care When Appendicitis Strikes KidsHow to Keep Kids Resilient in a Strange Holiday SeasonLockdowns May Be Keeping Kids' Asthma Attacks at Bay: StudyYoung Epilepsy Patients May Benefit From Mental Health ScreeningSudden Death More Common Than Thought in Very Young With EpilepsyCOVID in Kids: The Most Telling SymptomsPreemie Babies End Up Hospitalized More as KidsCommon Weight-Loss Surgery Can Weaken a Teen's BonesAnother Study Finds COVID Usually Mild in KidsParents' Age Key to Whether Kids Get Vaccinated Against COVID, Study FindsDoes Parents' Nagging Kids About Screen Time Even Matter?Which Kids With COVID Will Get Very Sick?Add Kids to COVID Vaccine Trials, Pediatricians' Group SaysToo Many Kids Still Get Antipsychotics They Don't NeedIs the Pandemic Harming Kids' Mental Health?Eczema More Common Among Black, Hispanic KidsTelemedicine Is Keeping Kids' Asthma Care on Track: StudyKids With Food Allergies Can Become Targets for BulliesHelp Young Athletes Keep Their Competitive Edge During PandemicAlmost 1 in 5 Parents Are 'Vaccine Hesitant,' Study FindsFor Rural Youth, Mental Health Care Can Be Tough to FindAre Healthy Kids Getting Too Many Heart Tests?Big Spike Seen in COVID Cases Among KidsAsymptomatic Kids With COVID-19 May Also Carry Less VirusLockdowns Can Widen Kids' Waistlines – Here's How to Curb ThatSocial Media 'Kid Influencers' Are Promoting Junk FoodsPoverty Might Raise Black Kids' Health Risks as Early as Age 5 Questions and AnswersVideosLinksBook Reviews100 Things Guys Need to Know3 NBS of Julian DrewA Guide to Asperger SyndromeA Tribe ApartA User Guide to the GF/CF Diet for Autism, Asperger Syndrome and AD/HDA Walk in the Rain With a BrainAdolescence and Body ImageAdolescent DepressionAfterAggression and Antisocial Behavior in Children and AdolescentsAll Alone in the UniverseAmelia RulesAmericaAnother PlanetAntisocial Behavior in Children and AdolescentsArtemis FowlAssessment and Treatment of Childhood Problems, Second EditionAutistic Spectrum DisordersBad GirlBetween Two WorldsBeyond AppearanceBeyond Diversity DayBig Mouth & Ugly GirlBill HensonBipolar DisordersBody Image, Eating Disorders, and ObesityBody Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity in YouthBoyBoysBrandedBreaking PointBreathing UnderwaterBringing Up ParentsBullying and TeasingCan't Eat, Won't EatCatalystChild and Adolescent Psychological DisordersChildren Changed by TraumaChildren with Emerald EyesChildren’s Dreaming and the Development of Consciousness City of OneConcise Guide to Child and Adolescent PsychiatryConquering the Beast WithinContentious IssuesCrackedCutDancing in My NuddypantsDemystifying the Autistic ExperienceDescartes' BabyDilemmas of DesireDirtyDoing ItDoing SchoolDying to Be ThinEating an ArtichokeEducating Children With AutismElijah's CupEllison the ElephantEmerald City BluesEmotional and Behavioral Problems of Young ChildrenEvery Girl Tells a StoryFast GirlsFeather BoyFiregirlForever YoungFreaks, Geeks and Asperger SyndromeFreewillGeography ClubGeorgia Under WaterGirl in the MirrorGirlfightingGirlsourceGirlWiseGLBTQGood GirlsGoodbye RuneGranny Torrelli Makes SoupGrowing Up GirlHandbook for BoysHealing ADDHeartbeatHelping Children Cope With Disasters and TerrorismHelping Parents, Youth, and Teachers Understand Medications for Behavioral and Emotional ProblemsHollow KidsHow Children Learn the Meanings of WordsHow to Keep Your Teenager Out of Trouble and What to Do If You Can'tHug MeIntrusive ParentingIt's Me!It's Perfectly NormalJake RileyJoey Pigza Swallowed the KeyJuvenile-Onset SchizophreniaKeeping the MoonKilling MonstersKim: Empty InsideKnocked Out by My Nunga-NungasLaura Numeroff's 10-Step Guide to Living with Your MonsterLearning About School ViolenceLeo the Lightning BugLet Kids Be KidsLiberation's ChildrenLife As We Know ItLisa, Bright and DarkLittle ChicagoLord of the FliesLoserLove and SexLove That DogManicMastering Anger and AggressionMind FieldsMiss American PieMom, Dad, I'm Gay.MonsterMore Than a LabelMyths of ChildhoodNew Hope for Children and Teens with Bipolar DisorderNo Two AlikeNot Much Just Chillin'Odd Girl OutOdd Girl Speaks OutOn the Frontier of AdulthoodOne Hot SecondOne in ThirteenOphelia SpeaksOphelia's MomOur Journey Through High Functioning Autism and Asperger SyndromeOut of the DustOvercoming School AnxietyParenting and the Child's WorldParenting Your Out-Of-Control TeenagerPediatric PsychopharmacologyPeriod PiecesPhobic and Anxiety Disorders in Children and AdolescentsPINSPraising Boys WellPraising Girls WellPretty in PunkPrincess in the SpotlightProblem Child or Quirky Kid?Psychotherapy As PraxisPsychotherapy for Children and AdolescentsRaising a Self-StarterRaising BlazeRaising Resilient ChildrenReclaiming Our ChildrenRedressing the EmperorReducing Adolescent RiskRethinking ADHDReweaving the Autistic TapestryRineke DijkstraRitalin is Not the Answer Action GuideRunning on RitalinSay YesSexual Teens, Sexual MediaSexuality in AdolescenceShooterShort PeopleShould I Medicate My Child?Skin GameSmackSmashedStaying Connected to Your TeenagerStick FigureStoner & SpazStop Arguing with Your KidsStraight Talk about Your Child's Mental HealthStrong, Smart, & BoldStudent DepressionSurvival Strategies for Parenting Children with Bipolar DisorderSurviving OpheliaTaking Charge of ADHD, Revised EditionTaming the Troublesome ChildTargeting AutismTeaching Problems and the Problems of TeachingTeen Angst? NaaahThat SummerThe American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook Of Child And Adolescent PsychiatryThe Arctic IncidentThe Bipolar ChildThe Buffalo TreeThe Bully, the Bullied, and the BystanderThe Carnivorous CarnivalThe Depressed ChildThe Developing MindThe Dragons of AutismThe Dream BearerThe Dulcimer Boy The Einstein SyndromeThe EpidemicThe Eternity CubeThe Explosive ChildThe Field of the DogsThe First IdeaThe Identity TrapThe Inside Story on Teen GirlsThe Little TernThe Mean Girl MotiveThe Men They Will BecomeThe Myth of LazinessThe New Gay TeenagerThe Notebook GirlsThe Nurture AssumptionThe Opposite of InvisibleThe Order of the Poison OakThe Other ParentThe Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday LifeThe Real Truth About Teens and SexThe Rise and Fall of the American TeenagerThe Secret Lives of GirlsThe Sex Lives of TeenagersThe Shared HeartThe Spider and the BeeThe StepsThe Thought that CountsThe Unhappy ChildThe Vile VillageThe Whole ChildThen Again, Maybe I Won'tTherapy with ChildrenThings I Have to Tell YouTouching Spirit BearTrauma in the Lives of ChildrenTreacherous LoveTrue BelieverTwistedUnhappy TeenagersWay to Be!We're Not MonstersWhat about the KidsWhat Would Joey Do?What's Happening to My Body? Book for BoysWhat's Happening to My Body? Book for GirlsWhen Nothing Matters AnymoreWhen Sex Goes to SchoolWhen Your Child Has an Eating DisorderWhere The Kissing Never StopsWhose America?Why Are You So Sad?WinnicottWorried All the TimeYes, Your Teen Is Crazy!You Hear MeYoung People and Mental HealthYour Child, Bully or Victim? |
| |
by Paul Bloom Basic Books, 2004 Review by Talia Welsh, Ph.D. on Sep 9th 2004 
Antonio Damiso's popular book Descartes'
Error was first recommended to me by a psychiatrist in Germany. She
explained to me that philosophers, such as myself, had been completely wrong in
assuming that such a thing as a soul or mind existed and that science proved
that we were not minds and bodies, but one unity--one embodied being--completely
assessable to any competent researcher in physiology and psychiatry.
I found myself both enchanted and
completely frustrated by this conversation. On the one hand, it is a rare
occurrence as a philosopher to meet a non-philosopher who is interested in
philosophical topics of discussion (except for the general interest in
discussing ethics). On the other hand, I felt great frustration at the gross
over-simplification and complete misrepresentation of René Descartes and
philosophy in general by writers like Damasio. However, largely I am heartened
by such discussions since I feel to at least be discussed is worthwhile since
philosophy is typically not a bestseller and that the fallacious arguments
presented can only hope to be reconciled with further discussion. Teaching at
a state university makes me even more happy to meet anyone who wants to tell me
there is no such thing as a mind as that our own administration looks
suspiciously at the humanities as something sucking up money while teaching
unpractical worthless nonsense. (Wouldn't the engineering or business program
be a better use of the university's scare resources?)
So, I was extremely interested to
find yet another popular psychology book called Descartes' Baby. As
that I work on the relevance of psychology for philosophical claims about the
subject, I found Bloom's book to be a great enterprise. Instead of claiming
that Descartes had it all wrong, Bloom claims that, actually, he has it right,
at least as far as the descriptive explanation of the development of the human
sense of mind goes.
What does it mean to say
"Descartes got it right"? For a philosopher, this could mean a
thousand different things and certainly not all Descartes' scholars are in
agreement about what Descartes' philosophy means. However, Bloom takes up the
typical one line explanation of Descartes' broad and subtle philosophy.
Frustrating as this is to read, the basic Cartesian claim Bloom takes up as
representative of Descartes is something along the lines: "there is a body
and there is a mind and they are separate." In other words, "Dualism
(mind-body) exists." Bloom writes intriguingly in the preface that
"Babies are natural-born dualists." (xiii)
I should note here, as Bloom does
in reference to a later discussion of a potential innate desire to believe in
God, that to say that descriptively we are natural-born dualists does not prove
in any manner that ontologically dualism exists. Bloom does not engage,
therefore, in the philosophical debate of the existence of dualism, i.e., is the
mind actually separate from the body?, but instead, he remains wisely
with a description of how we naturally see ourselves and others as having
minds. Whether or not minds do exist and what they might be like is not
answered in this text.
What evidence exists for such a
radical claim that babies are "natural-born dualists"? The idea of
babies having any preference for dualism, monism, or any philosophical theory
of mind seems absurd at first glance. Yet, Bloom draws some upon some
interesting research on infant and child behavior mixed liberally in with
tangential comments on his own children, literary/historical sources, and a few
random philosophical ideas, to argue that one of the things that makes us human
is that we innately suppose the other person has intentions, plans, and
desires. We don't conclude that the other person has a mind by observing the
data of sense-perception the other person gives us (i.e. monitoring the other's
behavior over an extended period of time). Instead, infant behavior and more
strikingly child behavior, reveals a prejudice to simply assume intention is
present in all human and many non-human acts.
Abundant research in the past
thirty years has indicated that infants are a great deal more aware than
previously thought by past greats of psychology such as Jean Piaget, B.F.
Skinner and Sigmund Freud. Infants do visually process their world and seem to
even comprehend its basic meaning. To help support some of this research
claiming the intelligence of infants, Bloom cites various studies that show one
of the problems of autism is that high functioning autistic children and adults
do not have any problems with processing the raw sense-data they receive from
the world. Their problem is that they don't assume a "ghost is in the
machine" nor do they ascribe intentions to moving objects, persons, nature
(this comes later in the discussion of God). Thus, they will report back all
sorts of "useless" data on a person's acts when what the normal
person is looking for is a quick summary "Jane wanted to go to the
mall" instead of a minute description of Jane's actual acts "she ate
a banana, she put on her clothes--blue pants, white top--she went at 8:28 into
the garage, she started the red Buick."
Thus, "[w]e are Descartes'
babies" insofar as we organize our relations with others around
intentionality and, therefore, the assumption of a mental organizing agent
behind the physical givens we encounter.(xiii) People, for young children, are
not first perceived and then through an intellectual process the child develops
and understands that these perceptions are the result of human beings like the
child. Rather, the child almost immediately ascribes desires, intentions,
wants to the other even before she can completely understand the larger
environmental world she lives in. Children naturally, thus, think there is
something behind the perceived changing set of sense-data. They are,
seemingly, naturally predisposed to ascribing intent behind visible acts.
Now, for a philosopher, dualism is
not the only way to explain how one might ascribe intentionality to another.
And, indeed, this seems to be Bloom's general point of view. With a rather
vague evolutionary argument, Bloom suggests that there are Darwinian reasons
for such an innate tendency. If I watch my fellow caveman throw a spear at the
Wooly Mammoth and miss and he grunts to me to do the same and I mimic him by
missing, we won't catch that Mammoth anytime soon. The obvious point is
"Hit that Mammoth!" even if I don't witness the "desired"
act itself. So, Bloom remains a materialist suggesting a material origin for
an innate belief of a mind and a body.
However, since I also see
intentionality in animals (i.e. "the cat wants to be let
outside") but I don't think they have minds in the way Descartes
understood minds, why would dualism be the proper way to describe our
infantile ability to intuit intentions in others? It seems that all Bloom
really wants to say is that we are predisposed to assuming other people have
"mental states" instead of having to conclude this by witnessing
their behavior over our developmental history. To be a true
"natural-born" dualist would be to innately assume that these mental
states occupy some qualitatively different realm than the physical body; something
akin to a soul. However, children seem to be natural realists in that they
will ascribe fantastical explanations if they have heard them (ghosts, witches,
etc.) but tend toward trying to explain unknown circumstances with the material
world they are familiar with. Bloom himself cites such studies and explains
children's occasional fantastical explanations as simply a response to the
difficulty of questions posed to them, not because they have committed
ideological preferences for non-material entities.
Thus, the title Descartes' Baby
is catchy, but I think something more along the lines of "Primary
Inter-subjectivity" would have been more accurate than to bring Cartesian
dualism into the discussion given Bloom's general theoretical starting point.
The largest portion of the book is
unfortunately not spent discussing all the manifold interesting studies on
these suggested basic structures of organizing the world and others. Rather,
Bloom strays into the favorite area of non-philosophers to discuss
philosophical themes: morality and ethics. I found these chapters tremendously
frustrating and ill-conceived. To say that we innately ascribe intentional
states to others seems a defensible claim. To throw in some vague ideas about
innate tendencies to have "moral circles" and ideas about God is so
problematic with the more, in my view, compelling empirical starting point of
the first chapters. Chapters 4-8 are extremely tangential in structure and
seem to be essentially an intelligent man musing out loud possible ideas about
where morality comes from without having really organized or researched the
domain.
My own musings on the nature of
good and evil suggest that without any systematic thought on the matter, human
beings seem in the current day and in history to be remarkably violent and
ill-disposed toward peace. Nonetheless, Bloom remains a rosy-eyed Darwinan
optimist (perhaps an oxymoron) about love among mankind. It turns out, history
be damned, that we are innately wired to love one another and to be
empathetic. As often with evolutionary thoughts on morality, a promissory note
is attached suggesting that since we are so wired somehow it will all work out
one day since it just doesn't make sense if we don't get along. Are you not
inspired with hope upon hearing this claim? Well, Bloom cites a study that
shows rats don't like seeing other rats be tortured so they will starve rather
than press a lever than tortures other rats. (pg. 113-114) I was tormented by
a continual "what!?" when reading these chapters after such a
promising beginning and from a person who seemed to base his starting
assumptions on facts. I'm no expert, but I think it is fair to say that humans
are not rats. We engage in torture and we like torture. Although I would like
to think otherwise, I assume that given the chance humans will continue to
torture and abuse other humans and will very often abuse their very own family
members. I don't see why this innate desire for empathy hasn't been a bit more
forceful in showing itself as the innate tendency toward ascribing
intentionality has been. If one is a materialist cum evolutionary
psychologist, one cannot blame "society" since society too is nothing
but a natural creation, no better or worse than incisors or claws.
Nonetheless, I did enjoy reading
the text and I hope it inspires more works of a similar nature. Anyone with an
interest in thinking about how our existential origins impact our later
theories about ourselves would do well to take a look at this text.
© 2004 Talia Welsh
Talia
Welsh, Ph.D., Department of Philosophy, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
|