19815 Bay Branch Rd
Andalusia, Alabama 36420
(334) 222-2523
HELPLINE: 1-877-530-0002



SCAMHC is an approved Mental Health site for the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment program.  Find out the program details and see if you qualify by visiting: http://nhsc.hrsa.gov/

SCAMHC is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer and maintains a Drug-Free Workplace





powered by centersite dot net
Women's Health
Basic InformationLatest News
Low-Fat Diet Could Be a Weapon Against Breast CancerAHA News: Why Are Women With Diabetes at Greater Risk for Poor Heart Health?Routine Use of Antibiotics May Help After Complicated Vaginal Birth: StudyAre You Running Short on Iron?Weight Before Pregnancy Most Important to Risk for ComplicationsIs AI a New Weapon in Breast Cancer Detection?Many Pregnancy-Related Maternal Deaths Occur Months After Delivery: CDCQuitting Smoking Helps Shield Women From Bladder Cancer: StudyThe Surprising Lead Cause of Death for Pregnant WomenBreast Surgeons' Group Issues New Mammogram GuidelinesHow to Know If Your PMS Is Something More SeriousHealth Tip: What to Expect From a Gynecologist VisitMale-Hormone Gene May Help Cause Polycystic Ovary SyndromeWhat Price Beauty for Women? Far More Than for MenSnoring Not Just a Male ProblemMany Women With Heart Disease Falling Short on ExerciseMost States Restrict Pregnant Women's Advance Directives: StudyStudy Supports Radiation for Early, Hormone-Driven Breast CancerLong-Term Antibiotic Use May Up Women's Odds for Heart Trouble1 in 9 U.S. Women Drink During Pregnancy, and Numbers Are RisingNot All Cervical Cancer Rates Are DecliningHPV Vaccine Driving Down Cervical Pre-Cancer RatesAHA News: Here's How Middle-Aged People -- Especially Women -- Can Avoid a Heart AttackC-Section Infection Risk Higher for Moms on Medicaid: StudyLegacy of Gulf War Deployment: Higher Risk of Minor Birth DefectsFDA Halts All Sales of Pelvic Mesh Products Tied to Injuries in WomenCelebrity 'Fat-Shaming' Affects All Women, Study FindsFDA Orders Label Warning on Alcohol Use With 'Female Viagra'Could Very Low 'Bad' Cholesterol Bring Stroke Danger?Herbals in Pregnancy May Endanger Mom, BabyEvenity Approved for Osteoporotic WomenWhen Do Women Need a Mammogram? New Guideline Tries to ClarifyMore Evidence HPV Vaccine Cuts Cervical Cancer RateBlack Women in the U.S. Still Missing Out on Heart CareIs That Medication Safe When Breastfeeding?Birth Control Pills May Protect Against Most Serious Ovarian Cancer: StudySurgery May Boost Outcomes in Common Form of Advanced Breast CancerHealth Tip: Treating EndometriosisFewer Periods May Mean Higher Dementia RiskDual-Drug Therapy May Boost Odds Against a Tough Breast CancerFDA Says Breast Density Must Be Reported to Women During MammogramsAHA News: Stressful Life Events Tied to Heart Disease in Older Black WomenLess Invasive Fibroid Treatment May Work as Well as SurgeryAffordable Care Act Brought Big Benefits to Women: StudyIs There a Safer Choice Than Opioids After a C-Section?Three Clues to Raised Risk of MiscarriageFDA Approves First Drug for Postpartum DepressionWhat Works Best for Women Struggling With a Leaky Bladder?Even Housework, Gardening Can Help an Older Woman's HeartAHA News: Black Woman in Their 50s Face Especially High Stroke Risk
Questions and AnswersVideosLinksBook ReviewsSelf-Help Groups
Related Topics

Wellness and Personal Development
Mental Disorders

Uterus 'Scratching' Technique Won't Boost Fertility Treatment Success

HealthDay News
by By Serena GordonHealthDay Reporter
Updated: Jan 23rd 2019

new article illustration

WEDNESDAY, Jan. 23, 2019 (HealthDay News) -- An add-on procedure sometimes used before in-vitro fertilization won't increase a couple's chances of having a baby, according to a new study.

The technique is called endometrial scratching. A thin plastic tube is inserted into the uterus through the cervix and a small sample of tissue is taken from the lining of the uterus (endometrium).

"It was thought that the action of taking this sample caused some sort of favorable disruption to the lining of the women and made it more likely for an embryo to implant [stick] to establish a pregnancy," explained study's lead author Sarah Lensen. She's from the University of Auckland in New Zealand.

But the study compared almost 700 women who had endometrial scratching to almost 700 women who didn't have the procedure before in-vitro fertilization and found no difference in the birth rate between the two groups. Each group had a 26 percent live birth rate.

The findings were published Jan. 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is a type of assisted reproductive technology. The mother's egg and father's sperm are joined in a lab. Then one or more of the fertilized eggs (embryos) are placed into the mother's uterus, with the hope that they will implant in the lining to begin a pregnancy, according to Planned Parenthood.

Fewer than half of the IVF cycles started are successful, according to the authors of an editorial accompanying the study. They noted that a recent review of add-on procedures designed to improve IVF success rates found 27 such add-ons. Of those, only endometrial scratching appeared to have any promise in boosting birth rates.

The procedure has been used in tens of thousands of women around the world, according to the editorial. The cost is between $200 and $500.

Lensen said that although some studies suggested a possible benefit from endometrial scratching, most of those studies were of poor quality. "It was uncertain whether there was really any benefit or not from this procedure," she said.

So, from a group of nearly 1,400 women undergoing IVF, half were randomly selected to undergo endometrial scratching before the embryos were placed.

Although there was no benefit in terms of live birth, the procedure didn't seem to cause any significant harms. Rates of miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy weren't increased. There was some pain related to the procedure in the endometrial scratching group, however.

"This is the largest and most robust study undertaken on this topic, which demonstrates no benefit from the procedure, and some harm [mild pain] for women undergoing the procedure, who are also normally having to pay for it out of their own pocket," Lensen said.

Will these findings lead to a change in practice?

"We know that some clinics have already changed practice based on the results of this study, which were presented at a fertility conference in July 2018," Lensen said.

"However, the results of this study go against much of the previous research and many fertility clinics already offer this procedure to their patients, so it can be difficult to change practice," she noted.

Dr. Kurt Barnhart is one of the editorial's authors and a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He said he hopes this study is enough to change practice.

But, he added, not all doctors have been using this procedure.

"Endometrial scratching hasn't caught on with everyone, and this study might nip it in the bud and stop more people from adopting it," said Barnhart.

He said the study highlights the need for add-on fertility treatments to be well-studied before they're widely adopted.

More information

The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology offers more about assisted reproductive technology.