19815 Bay Branch Rd
Andalusia, Alabama 36420
(334) 222-2523
HELPLINE: 1-877-530-0002



SCAMHC is an approved Mental Health site for the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment program.  Find out the program details and see if you qualify by visiting: http://nhsc.hrsa.gov/

SCAMHC is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer and maintains a Drug-Free Workplace





powered by centersite dot net
Women's Health
Basic InformationLatest News
What Works Best for Women Struggling With a Leaky Bladder?Even Housework, Gardening Can Help an Older Woman's HeartAHA News: Black Woman in Their 50s Face Especially High Stroke RiskEarly-Onset Menstruation Linked to Later High Blood Pressure RiskClaire's Recalls 3 Cosmetic Products Due to Possible Asbestos ContaminationScientists Spot Clues to Predicting Breast Cancer's ReturnAre Some Birth Control Methods Doomed to Fail?AHA News: Belly Fat Ups Older Women's Heart Risks, Even Without ObesityHormone Therapy Linked to Slight Rise in Alzheimer's RiskFDA Issues Asbestos Warning About Some Claire's Cosmetic ProductsHigh Deductibles May Threaten Breast Cancer Patients' SurvivalHow Soon Should You Conceive After a Stillbirth?Lifestyle Changes Can Lower Your Breast Cancer RiskPrenatal Vitamins Might Lower Risk of Second Child With AutismLong Work Weeks May Be Depressing, Especially for WomenSingle Moms Often Put Kids' Health Care First, Study FindsCervical 'Microbiome' Could Help Predict Cancer RiskDon't Be Fooled: Thermography No Substitute for Mammograms, FDA SaysWhat's the Right Age to Test for Osteoporosis?Most Nations May Be Rid of Cervical Cancer By 2100HPV Infections Most Tied to Cancer Are in Decline, and Vaccines May Be WhyExperimental Drug Helps Women With Deadly Type of Breast CancerAHA News: Why Are Black Women at Higher Risk of Dying From Pregnancy Complications?Acupuncture Could Help Ease Menopausal SymptomsAHA News: Could 'Cardio-Obstetrics' Curb Rise in Pregnancy-Related Deaths?Should You Get Tested for the 'Breast Cancer Genes'?Common Yeast Infection Treatment Tied to Miscarriage, Birth DefectsHeart Attacks Rising Among Younger WomenBreast Cancer and DDT: Timing of Exposure May MatterCould Diet Sodas Raise an Older Woman's Stroke Risk?Mammograms Helped Save Up to 600,000 U.S. Lives Since 1989: StudyAHA News: Pregnancy May Raise Risk of Deadliest Type of StrokeAHA News: Many Women Plagued by Anxiety After StrokeBenign Ovarian Cysts Should Be Left in Place, Study SuggestsToo Much TV Raises Women's Odds for Early-Onset Colon Cancer: StudyWomen's Brains May Be More 'Age-Resistant' Than Men'sHealth Screenings Every Woman NeedsAHA: Could a Heart Attack or Stroke Lead to Early Menopause?Breast Cancer May Bring Higher Odds for A-fib, TooHealth Tip: Help Prevent Cervical CancerUterus 'Scratching' Technique Won't Boost Fertility Treatment SuccessMoms, Are You Victims of 'Invisible Labor'?Mindfulness Might Ease Menopause SymptomsBody Size May Influence Longevity in Women, But Not MenHPV Vaccine Even Helps Women Who Didn't Get It: StudyAt Risk for Breast Cancer? Your Race MattersTwo-Thirds of Poor U.S. Women Can't Afford Menstrual Pads, Tampons: StudyVaccine, Screening Can Prevent Cervical Cancer DeathsAHA: Breastfeeding May Help a Mom's HeartAI Beats Humans at Detecting Cervical Precancers
Questions and AnswersVideosLinksBook ReviewsSelf-Help Groups
Related Topics

Wellness and Personal Development
Mental Disorders

Uterus 'Scratching' Technique Won't Boost Fertility Treatment Success

HealthDay News
by By Serena GordonHealthDay Reporter
Updated: Jan 23rd 2019

new article illustration

WEDNESDAY, Jan. 23, 2019 (HealthDay News) -- An add-on procedure sometimes used before in-vitro fertilization won't increase a couple's chances of having a baby, according to a new study.

The technique is called endometrial scratching. A thin plastic tube is inserted into the uterus through the cervix and a small sample of tissue is taken from the lining of the uterus (endometrium).

"It was thought that the action of taking this sample caused some sort of favorable disruption to the lining of the women and made it more likely for an embryo to implant [stick] to establish a pregnancy," explained study's lead author Sarah Lensen. She's from the University of Auckland in New Zealand.

But the study compared almost 700 women who had endometrial scratching to almost 700 women who didn't have the procedure before in-vitro fertilization and found no difference in the birth rate between the two groups. Each group had a 26 percent live birth rate.

The findings were published Jan. 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is a type of assisted reproductive technology. The mother's egg and father's sperm are joined in a lab. Then one or more of the fertilized eggs (embryos) are placed into the mother's uterus, with the hope that they will implant in the lining to begin a pregnancy, according to Planned Parenthood.

Fewer than half of the IVF cycles started are successful, according to the authors of an editorial accompanying the study. They noted that a recent review of add-on procedures designed to improve IVF success rates found 27 such add-ons. Of those, only endometrial scratching appeared to have any promise in boosting birth rates.

The procedure has been used in tens of thousands of women around the world, according to the editorial. The cost is between $200 and $500.

Lensen said that although some studies suggested a possible benefit from endometrial scratching, most of those studies were of poor quality. "It was uncertain whether there was really any benefit or not from this procedure," she said.

So, from a group of nearly 1,400 women undergoing IVF, half were randomly selected to undergo endometrial scratching before the embryos were placed.

Although there was no benefit in terms of live birth, the procedure didn't seem to cause any significant harms. Rates of miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy weren't increased. There was some pain related to the procedure in the endometrial scratching group, however.

"This is the largest and most robust study undertaken on this topic, which demonstrates no benefit from the procedure, and some harm [mild pain] for women undergoing the procedure, who are also normally having to pay for it out of their own pocket," Lensen said.

Will these findings lead to a change in practice?

"We know that some clinics have already changed practice based on the results of this study, which were presented at a fertility conference in July 2018," Lensen said.

"However, the results of this study go against much of the previous research and many fertility clinics already offer this procedure to their patients, so it can be difficult to change practice," she noted.

Dr. Kurt Barnhart is one of the editorial's authors and a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He said he hopes this study is enough to change practice.

But, he added, not all doctors have been using this procedure.

"Endometrial scratching hasn't caught on with everyone, and this study might nip it in the bud and stop more people from adopting it," said Barnhart.

He said the study highlights the need for add-on fertility treatments to be well-studied before they're widely adopted.

More information

The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology offers more about assisted reproductive technology.