19815 Bay Branch Rd
Andalusia, Alabama 36420
(334) 222-2523
HELPLINE: 1-877-530-0002



Facebook    

 

SCAMHC is an approved Mental Health site for the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment program.  Find out the program details and see if you qualify by visiting: http://nhsc.hrsa.gov/

SCAMHC is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer and maintains a Drug-Free Workplace

 

 

 

 


powered by centersite dot net
Women's Health
Resources
Basic InformationLatest News
Mental Health Problems After First Baby Reduce Likelihood of More Children: StudyWhen Arteries Narrow, Chest Pain Can Come Earlier for Women Than MenRacial, Ethnic Gaps in Insurance Put Moms, Babies at Risk: StudyStatins Might Reduce Harms From Breast Cancer ChemoExpectant Moms: Take Care and Don't Panic About CoronavirusGene Tests May Guard Older Breast Cancer Patients Against Other TumorsAHA News: Changing the Way We View Women's Heart Attack SymptomsMaria Shriver Sounds the Alarm on Women and Alzheimer'sAHA News: Estrogen Therapy in Early Menopause May Help Keep Arteries ClearDon't Wait, for Your Baby's Sake: Quit Smoking Before You're PregnantFemale Firefighters Face Higher Exposure to CarcinogensNew Moms Need to Watch Out for High Blood PressureBad Sleep, Bad Diet = Bad Heart?A Woman's Guide to Skin Care During and After MenopauseAHA News: What Women Need to Know About Breast Cancer and Heart DiseaseIs High Blood Pressure in First Pregnancy a Harbinger of Heart Trouble?AHA News: Domestic Abuse May Do Long-Term Damage to Women's Health'Couch Potato' Lifestyle Poses Danger to Women's HeartsWomen Patients Still Missing in Heart Research2 in 3 Women Unhappy With Their Breast Size. Could That Harm Their Health?Pregnant Moms Who Smoke, Drink Put Babies at Risk of SIDS: Study2 in 3 Americans Unaware That Heart Disease Is Leading Killer of WomenEmployers Need to Do More to Help Breastfeeding Moms: SurveyStrong Support Network Is Key to Women's Cancer Recovery: StudyCervical Cancer Could All But Disappear in North America by 2040Pregnancy, Breastfeeding May Guard Against Early MenopauseMany Moms-to-Be Are Stressed, and it Might Affect Baby's BrainLess Sex Could Mean Earlier MenopauseWomen's Blood Pressure Rises Earlier, Faster Than Men'sTrauma of Miscarriage May Trigger PTSDA Lifetime of Fitness Helps Women's Muscles in Old AgeLarge Study Shows No Strong Link Between Baby Powder, Ovarian CancerVictoria's Secret Models Are Skinnier Now, as Average Woman's Waistline WidensMany Girls, Young Women Getting Unnecessary Pelvic ExamsAI Beat Humans in Spotting Breast TumorsBreast Density Alerts Might Not Be Helping WomenHealth Tip: Breast Cancer Screening GuidelinesShedding Pounds May Shrink Breast Cancer RiskMost Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors Die From Other CausesNew Study Shakes Up Thinking on Hormone Replacement TherapyBreast Cancer Drug Shows Long-Lasting Prevention PowerBreastfeeding May Bring Added Bonus for Women With MSAre Superbugs Making Themselves at Home in Your Makeup Bag?Health Tip: Heart Attack Symptoms in WomenIs Childbirth More Dangerous in Rural Areas?Good Workouts Might Extend a Woman's LifeDomestic Abuse Can Leave Legacy of Poor HealthMom-to-Be's Diabetes May Up Odds of Heart Disease in Her KidsStudy Links Hair Straighteners, Dyes to Breast CancerA Birth Control Pill You Take Just Once a Month?
Questions and AnswersVideosLinksBook ReviewsSelf-Help Groups
Related Topics

Wellness and Personal Development
Mental Disorders

AI Beat Humans in Spotting Breast Tumors

HealthDay News
by By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter
Updated: Jan 3rd 2020

new article illustration

FRIDAY, Jan. 3, 2020 (HealthDay News) -- Machines can be trained to outperform humans when it comes to catching breast tumors on mammograms, a new study suggests.

Researchers at Google and several universities are working on an artificial intelligence (AI) model aimed at improving the accuracy of mammography screening. In the Jan. 1 issue of Nature, they describe the initial results: Computers, it seems, can beat radiologists both in detecting breast tumors and avoiding false alarms.

Compared with mammography results collected from routine practice, the computer model reduced false positives by 1.2% (at three U.K. hospitals) and 5.7% (at one U.S. center). "False positive" refers to a mammogram that is deemed abnormal, even though no cancer is present.

"That means we could, potentially, create less angst for patients," said researcher Dr. Mozziyar Etemadi, an assistant professor at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, in Chicago.

Artificial intelligence also bested humans when it came to false negatives -- where a mammogram is interpreted as normal despite the presence of a tumor. The algorithm reduced those cases by 2.7% in the United Kingdom, and by 9.4% in the United States.

Etemadi called the findings "exciting," but also stressed that research into using AI in medicine is "still in its infancy."

Nor will it be replacing humans any time soon. Instead, Etemadi explained, AI is seen as a "tool" to boost doctors' efficiency and accuracy.

As an example, he said AI could be used to "re-order the queue" -- so that instead of analyzing mammograms in the order they come in, radiologists could have certain images with suspicious findings flagged for priority review.

Mammography screening can detect breast cancer in its earliest stages, but it's imperfect: According to the American Cancer Society, it misses about 20% of cancers. And if a woman gets a mammogram every year for 10 years, she has about a 50% chance of receiving a false positive at some point.

The new study, funded by Google, is the latest to explore whether AI can help detect cancer.

Typically, it works like this: Researchers develop an algorithm using "deep learning" -- where a computer system mimics the brain's neural networks. It's exposed to a large number of images -- digital mammograms, for example -- and it teaches itself to recognize key features, such as signs of a tumor.

Other studies have suggested that AI can outperform humans in diagnosing certain cancers. One found that computers bested dermatologists in distinguishing harmless moles from melanoma skin cancer. Another found that AI was typically better than pathologists at finding breast tumor cells in lymph node samples.

This latest AI model was "trained" by exposing it to mammograms from over 90,000 women whose outcomes were known. The researchers then tested the model on a separate dataset, involving mammograms from over 25,000 U.K. women and 3,000-plus U.S. women.

Overall, the model reduced false positive and false negative results. The improvement was greater in the United States. While it's not certain why, Etemadi pointed to one potential reason: In the United Kingdom, it's standard for two radiologists to analyze a mammogram, which generally improves the accuracy.

But while the AI model performed well in this "controlled environment," it remains to be seen how it will work in the real world, said Dr. Stamatia Destounis.

She is a spokesperson for the Radiological Society of North America and a clinical professor of imaging sciences at the University of Rochester, in New York.

"What's needed are clinical studies in real day-to-day practice to see if these findings can be reproduced," Destounis said.

Even in this controlled setting, the AI model was not foolproof. It did not detect all cancers or eliminate false positives. And sometimes it lost out to humans.

In a separate experiment, the researchers pitted the AI model against six U.S. radiologists. Overall, the computer was better, but there were cases where the doctors correctly saw a tumor the machine missed.

So what did the AI model overlook? And what did it see that doctors didn't? No one knows, Etemadi said.

"At this point, we can only observe the patterns," he said. "We don't know the 'why.'"

But, he added, it all suggests the combined forces of human and machine would be better than either alone.

To Destounis, the prospect of a new tool to help spot breast cancer is "exciting."

"I'm hopeful that AI will be another tool in our clinical practice to help radiologists identify breast cancer as early as possible -- when the tumor is smallest and the treatment least invasive," she said.

More information

The American Cancer Society has more on mammography.